• Failure Mode Identification
  • Effects Analysis
  • Automated Severity Rating
  • Root Cause Analysis
  • Evaluations
  • Steps Timing
  • Observation Notes
  • AI Driven Summaries, Suggestions & Projects
  • *Available 3rd party Integrations

AI Automation Designed for You!

Praxie’s AI-powered FMEA software transforms complex process steps into actionable data insights and significantly boosts productivity of your unique workflows.
AI-Powered Enhanced Visibility and Waste Reduction
Improved Efficiency, Productivity and Decision Making
Customer Focus, Cost Reduction and Process Improvement

“Our team used to take days manually creating status reports. Today, Praxie’s Connected Worker AI automatically creates business summaries, reports and action plans for every layer of management, it’s amazing!.” – Satisfied Customer

Anticipate Risks

Detect and address failures early

Streamline Processes

Optimize risk management effortlessly

Enhance Collaboration

Boost team synergy in quality assurance

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Overview

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a proactive, systematic tool in manufacturing aimed at identifying potential failure modes of a product or process and assessing the potential impact of those failures. Engineers, quality specialists, and process managers typically employ FMEA to rank the severity and likelihood of each failure mode, leading to the prioritization of risks and the formulation of mitigation strategies. By foreseeing and addressing possible points of failure, FMEA enhances product reliability, improves safety, and reduces warranty-related costs, fostering both operational excellence and heightened customer trust.

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Details

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) stands as a cornerstone in the realm of quality assurance and risk management within the manufacturing sector. This structured methodology is pivotal in preemptively recognizing, evaluating, and prioritizing potential failure modes in a system, product, or process. FMEA’s primary objective is to instigate actions that would eliminate or reduce the occurrence of these potential failures, bolstering product or process reliability and safety.

  1. Identification of Failure Modes: The process begins by listing possible ways a product or process can fail, be it due to design flaws, material inconsistencies, or operational lapses.
  2. Determination of Effects: For each identified failure mode, the subsequent effects on the system, end-users, or processes are described, ensuring a holistic view of potential outcomes.
  3. Severity Rating: Each effect is given a severity rating, typically on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 indicating a catastrophic failure leading to severe consequences, such as safety or regulatory implications.
  4. Root Cause Analysis: The potential causes for each failure mode are identified, drawing from sources like historical data, team experience, or predictive modeling.
  5. Occurrence Rating: Each cause is then rated based on its likelihood of occurrence, again usually on a scale from 1 to 10, with 10 indicating a high probability of the failure mode occurring.
  6. Evaluation of Current Controls: Existing processes or measures that prevent or detect the failure mode are identified and assessed for their effectiveness.
  7. Detection Rating: The ability of the current controls to detect the failure before it reaches the customer is rated, with 1 indicating a high likelihood of detection and 10 indicating low or no likelihood.
  8. Risk Priority Number (RPN): For each failure mode, the RPN is calculated by multiplying the severity, occurrence, and detection ratings. This quantified metric aids in prioritizing areas that require corrective actions.
  9. Action and Review: Based on the RPN, corrective actions are determined and implemented. After actions are taken, the FMEA is revisited to ensure the desired reduction in risk, updating the analysis as necessary.

The FMEA tool is an invaluable asset in the manufacturing domain, offering a structured lens through which potential failures can be scrutinized and addressed. By methodically assessing and ranking risks, organizations can foster enhanced reliability, reduce costs associated with post-production issues, and solidify customer trust. Employing FMEA ensures a proactive stance against unforeseen challenges, anchoring quality and consistency at the heart of production.

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Process

In the competitive landscape of manufacturing, ensuring product reliability and safety is paramount. For a project manager, introducing the Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) into an organization signifies a strategic shift towards proactive risk management and heightened quality assurance. As a systematic approach, FMEA identifies and prioritizes potential points of failure in products or processes, paving the way for mitigation strategies that safeguard both the product’s integrity and the organization’s reputation.

  1. Secure Top Management Buy-In: Before launching an FMEA initiative, obtain endorsement and support from senior management. Their backing ensures resource allocation and organization-wide commitment, vital for successful implementation.
  2. Identify Key Personnel and Form a Team: Select a cross-functional team encompassing design, manufacturing, quality, and other relevant departments. This diversity ensures comprehensive insight, leveraging expertise from multiple domains.
  3. Train the Team: Invest in training sessions to familiarize the team with FMEA principles, tools, and techniques. A well-trained team can identify, evaluate, and address potential failure modes more effectively.
  4. Choose a Pilot Project: Select a specific product, system, or process to initiate the FMEA process. This pilot provides a tangible starting point, allowing the team to apply their training and refine the approach in a controlled setting.
  5. Conduct the FMEA: Under the project manager’s guidance, the team should meticulously identify potential failure modes, assess their impacts, and calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN) for each. The insights garnered from this analysis set the stage for corrective actions.
  6. Implement Corrective Actions and Monitor: Based on the FMEA findings, prioritize and implement corrective measures. Continually monitor these interventions for effectiveness, making necessary adjustments to ensure risks are aptly mitigated.
  7. Review and Standardize: Upon the successful implementation of FMEA in the pilot project, consider rolling out the methodology organization-wide. Regularly review and update the FMEA process, ensuring it remains aligned with evolving organizational goals and industry standards.

Implementing FMEA in a manufacturing setting is a transformative endeavor, fostering a culture of preemptive risk identification and management. As organizations pivot to this approach, the tangible benefits include enhanced product reliability, minimized rework costs, and bolstered customer confidence. Success hinges on continuous team training, cross-departmental collaboration, and iterative refinement, all orchestrated under the vigilant oversight of an adept project manager.

Our Customers Achieve Great Results

We’re much more than software. Get personalized consulting, guidance, and coaching from experts with decades of experience.

Let’s discuss your manufacturing digital transformation

Your Manufacturing Digital Transformation Practice Lead

Michael Lynch

Michael Lynch is a creative and successful executive with extensive leadership experience in delivering innovative collaboration products and building global businesses. Prior to founding Praxie, Michael led the Internet of Things business at SAP. He joined SAP as part of the acquisition of Right Hemisphere Inc., where he held the position of CEO. During his tenure, he transformed a small tools provider for graphics professionals to the global leader in Visualization software for Global 1,000 manufacturers and led the company to a successful acquisition by SAP.